Town of Seekonk Meetings
Search and subscribe to town meeting topics that impact you
← Back to video
Select Board Meeting — January 21, 2026
−
Fit
+
IN
0:00
OUT
0:00
Length
0:00
▶ Play selection
Export clip
Keyboard:
I
set in,
O
set out,
←
/
→
nudge playhead 5s.
1:04
Good.
In
Out
1:05
Okay, all set.
In
Out
1:06
Thank you.
In
Out
1:08
Welcome everybody to the select board meeting, Wednesday, January 21st, 2026, 6 PM, select board meeting room.
In
Out
1:16
100 Peck Street, Seekonk.
In
Out
1:18
Mass General Law Chapter 38, subsection 20F requires any person recording must notify the chair at the beginning of the meeting.
In
Out
1:25
Is anybody recording?
In
Out
1:27
Seeing no one, all select board meetings are recorded via audio and video and are broadcast live on Seekonk Channel 15.
In
Out
1:35
I call the meeting to order at 6 PM.
In
Out
1:37
Can we have a Pledge of Allegiance and a moment of silence, please?
In
Out
1:42
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
In
Out
2:04
Could somebody read the board and committee openings, please?
In
Out
2:08
Whose turn is it?
In
Out
2:09
Actually, I did it last time.
In
Out
2:10
Someone else wants to read?
In
Out
2:12
No?
In
Out
2:13
Okay.
In
Out
2:13
There you go.
In
Out
2:14
All right.
In
Out
2:16
We have lots of openings.
In
Out
2:18
Boards and committees.
In
Out
2:19
We are looking for volunteers on the Capital Improvement Committee.
In
Out
2:23
We've got 4 board of selectmen and 3 moderator appointments.
In
Out
2:26
Commission on Disability, 8 board of selectmen appointments.
In
Out
2:30
Cultural Council, 2 board of selectmen appointments.
In
Out
2:33
The Economic Development Committee is looking for 5 Board of Selectmen appointments.
In
Out
2:37
Energy Committee needs 3 Board of Selectmen appointments.
In
Out
2:40
Finance Committee has 1 moderator appointment.
In
Out
2:43
Historical Commission, 3 Board of Selectmen appointments.
In
Out
2:47
Parks and Recreation is looking for 1.
In
Out
2:49
Recycling Committee, 1 Board of Selectmen appointment.
In
Out
2:53
And the Zoning Board of Appeals is looking for 2 Board of Selectmen, 1 alternate and 1 regular.
In
Out
3:01
That's it.
In
Out
3:01
Thank you.
In
Out
3:03
Consider the annual designation of Andrea Russo as animal control officer per Mass General Law Chapter 140, subsection 151.
In
Out
3:16
So moved.
In
Out
3:18
Second.
In
Out
3:21
I didn't even ask if you considered yet.
In
Out
3:24
Any questions?
In
Out
3:24
Got a motion and a second.
In
Out
3:26
Anybody have any questions?
In
Out
3:27
Seeing none, all in favor?
In
Out
3:28
Aye.
In
Out
3:28
Any opposed?
In
Out
3:29
Seeing Seeing none, unanimous.
In
Out
3:31
Thank you.
In
Out
3:32
Don't go too far.
In
Out
3:34
Consider the annual designation of Jessica Blake as Assistant Animal Control Officer per Mass General Law Chapter 140, subsection 151.
In
Out
3:44
So moved.
In
Out
3:44
Second.
In
Out
3:46
I get a motion and a second.
In
Out
3:48
Does anybody have any questions?
In
Out
3:51
For those who are looking, this is Jessica Blake.
In
Out
3:54
All in favor?
In
Out
3:55
Aye.
In
Out
3:55
Any opposed?
In
Out
3:57
Seeing none, unanimous.
In
Out
3:58
Thanks, Jessica.
In
Out
4:00
Consider the annual designation of Ashley Lawrence as Assistant Animal Control Officer per Mass General Law Chapter 140, subsection 151.
In
Out
4:08
Aye.
In
Out
4:09
So moved.
In
Out
4:10
Second.
In
Out
4:11
I got a motion and a second.
In
Out
4:13
Does anybody have any questions?
In
Out
4:15
Seeing none, all in favor?
In
Out
4:17
Any opposed?
In
Out
4:19
Seeing none, unanimous.
In
Out
4:21
Thank you, Ashley, very much.
In
Out
4:24
Consider accepting the animal control officer's warrant.
In
Out
4:28
Miss Russo, nice to see you again.
In
Out
4:32
Good evening.
In
Out
4:42
Madam Chair, members of the board, Mr. Dean, in accordance with Massachusetts— hold the mic a little closer.
In
Out
4:47
Sorry.
In
Out
4:48
Thank you.
In
Out
4:49
In accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 140 as amended and foregoing warrant, I, Andrea Rusar, hereby make due return of my doings in compliance therewith as follows: number of dogs for the period of April 1st, 2025 to December 31st, 2025, um, 44 caught, 44 confined, 12 adopted, 26 claimed, 0 DOA.
In
Out
5:16
1 euthanized, 5 in the shelter, 0 transferred, for a total of 44.
In
Out
5:21
Number of cats for the period of April 1st, 2025 to December 31st, 2025: 72 caught, 62 confined, 40 adopted, 2 died, 6 claimed, 10 DOA, hit by car, 2 euthanized, 10 in the shelter, 0 in foster, 1 returned, 1 released, for a total of 72.
In
Out
5:47
To the best of my knowledge and belief, all unlicensed dogs in said town of Seekonk has been caught, confined, killed, or adopted, sold.
In
Out
5:55
And complaints have been made against the following named persons under the provisions of MGL Chapter 140 as amended.
In
Out
6:03
Tickets written from April 1st, 2025 to December 31st, 2025, for non-criminal offenses.
In
Out
6:10
For failure to license, 46 for $2,300.
In
Out
6:16
Dog at large, first offense, 9 for $225.
In
Out
6:20
Dog at large, second offense, 2 for $80.
In
Out
6:23
Failure to vaccinate against rabies, 3 for $300.
In
Out
6:27
Animal in vehicle in clement weather, 1 at $150.
In
Out
6:32
Barking complaint And citation for one at $25.
In
Out
6:37
Total tickets 62 for $3,080.
In
Out
6:41
Total number of dogs licensed from April 1st, 2025 to December 31st, 2025, 1,982.
In
Out
6:49
So far I had knowledge complaints have been entered against all persons who have failed to comply with said provisions.
In
Out
6:57
Thank you.
In
Out
6:57
Can I get a motion?
In
Out
6:59
So moved.
In
Out
7:00
Second.
In
Out
7:02
Got a motion and a second.
In
Out
7:03
Does anybody have any questions for Ms. Russo on this?
In
Out
7:08
Seeing none, all in favor?
In
Out
7:09
Aye.
In
Out
7:10
Any opposed?
In
Out
7:11
Seeing none, unanimous.
In
Out
7:14
Thank you.
In
Out
7:15
Consider accepting the list of donations in the amount of $2,649.62 to the Seekonk Animal shelter.
In
Out
7:28
This list is from July 1st, 2025 to December 31st, '25, in the amount of $2,649.62.
In
Out
7:37
I want to thank everybody who's donated.
In
Out
7:39
Um, we appreciate everything they do.
In
Out
7:43
Can I get a motion?
In
Out
7:44
So moved.
In
Out
7:45
Second.
In
Out
7:47
I got a motion and a second.
In
Out
7:48
Any questions for Miss Russo?
In
Out
7:52
Seeing none, all in favor?
In
Out
7:53
Aye.
In
Out
7:53
Any opposed?
In
Out
7:55
Seeing none, unanimous.
In
Out
7:58
Consider the acceptance of a donation from Rocky's Ace Hardware in the amount of $599.19 to the Seekonk Animal Shelter.
In
Out
8:08
Um, yes, so once again, Rocky's Ace Hardware did their 15th annual holiday pet roundup, and they managed to raise $599.19.
In
Out
8:18
We thank them.
In
Out
8:18
They think of us all the time.
In
Out
8:20
We appreciate everything they do.
In
Out
8:21
That's good.
In
Out
8:23
Can I get a motion?
In
Out
8:24
So moved.
In
Out
8:25
Second.
In
Out
8:26
Okay, a motion and a second.
In
Out
8:28
Does anybody have any questions for Ms. Russo on this?
In
Out
8:30
Seeing none, all in favor?
In
Out
8:33
Aye.
In
Out
8:33
Any opposed?
In
Out
8:35
Seeing none, unanimous.
In
Out
8:37
Community— thank you.
In
Out
8:38
Good evening.
In
Out
8:39
You too.
In
Out
8:40
Thank you.
In
Out
8:41
Community Speaks.
In
Out
8:48
Somebody wants to come up and talk to me.
In
Out
8:50
I know they do.
In
Out
8:52
Come on.
In
Out
8:55
Nope, just one of you is good.
In
Out
8:56
Come on up, sir.
In
Out
9:02
Just give us your name and your title and why you're here.
In
Out
9:05
William Davis from the law firm Brainsky Levinson, 1539 Fall River Avenue.
In
Out
9:10
I'm here to speak in favor of the billboard bylaw proposal and the billboard overlay district.
In
Out
9:17
Okay, I'm going to ask the board, because he's here to talk about that and that is on the agenda, that we allow this gentleman and the other people that are going to talk when we discuss it on the agenda, that he'd be allowed to come and talk.
In
Out
9:32
Sure.
In
Out
9:32
Yeah, I think that'd be more advantageous than having him say his side now.
In
Out
9:37
We'll get it all together.
In
Out
9:38
Is that good for everyone?
In
Out
9:40
Yeah.
In
Out
9:40
Okay, thanks.
In
Out
9:41
Thank you.
In
Out
9:42
We'll see you again.
In
Out
9:46
Anyone else from the community wish to speak?
In
Out
9:50
Okay, seeing none.
In
Out
9:51
General business public hearing.
In
Out
9:53
Consider the request for an all-alcohol on-premises liquor license for Ugly Dumpling Seaconk LLC, doing business as Ugly Dumpling, to be located at 1105 Fall River Avenue, Seaconk, Mass.
In
Out
10:07
Zhang Quanwen, owner.
In
Out
10:09
Xianfen Wu, manager.
In
Out
10:12
And I apologize if I pronounce them wrong.
In
Out
10:16
I'll take a motion to enter into public hearing.
In
Out
10:20
So moved.
In
Out
10:21
Second.
In
Out
10:22
At 6:09.
In
Out
10:25
Okay, got a motion and a second.
In
Out
10:27
All in favor?
In
Out
10:28
Aye.
In
Out
10:29
Any opposed?
In
Out
10:30
Seeing none, we are now in for public hearing.
In
Out
10:33
Now, sir, tell me who you are.
In
Out
10:36
I am Attorney Tyler Hensler, here on behalf of Ugly Dumpling Seaconch LLC, which will be doing business as the Ugly Dumpling.
In
Out
10:44
Okay.
In
Out
10:46
Joining me, just as way of introduction, is Xiaofeng Michael Wu, who is the manager of record, and Robert Massey, who's the regional GM for the company.
In
Out
10:59
So Mr. Wu goes by Michael?
In
Out
11:01
He does, he does.
In
Out
11:03
Thank you.
In
Out
11:04
Um, would the board, uh, like to hear a little bit, or would they, um— Yeah, we do.
In
Out
11:09
Okay, great.
In
Out
11:10
So, uh, as the board is aware, The Ugly Dumpling is applying for a new Section 12 restaurant license at this location.
In
Out
11:18
The concept is a large space.
In
Out
11:21
It's 7,900 square feet restaurant space that seats 246 people.
In
Out
11:27
They will serve dim sum, Shanghai-style street food, and all different kinds of dumplings, which are handmade and fresh.
In
Out
11:36
They will also offer a menu of beer, wine, and cocktails, hence the all-alcohol license request over beer and wine, that will pair with the menu items and be amenities to the, to the customers.
In
Out
11:48
This is a primarily sit-down restaurant, not primarily a bar.
In
Out
11:53
Um, but they will have takeout options available as well, as well as third-party app options.
In
Out
12:00
There is plenty of parking in their lot for both dine-in and takeout customers, as well as the ability to have designated spaces for those deliveries.
In
Out
12:07
Okay, sir, this is the old, um, TGI Fridays.
In
Out
12:10
Thank you.
In
Out
12:10
Yes, yes it is.
In
Out
12:12
Just so that people listening and those of us— to orient yourself.
In
Out
12:17
Yeah, yeah.
In
Out
12:17
Okay, go ahead.
In
Out
12:19
Yes.
In
Out
12:19
Uh, so plenty of parking for, for the, the app, um, you know, delivery drivers, so there won't be an issue with, with traffic.
In
Out
12:29
They are here, uh, for the long-term investment in the community.
In
Out
12:32
Their lease is for a term of 15 years, and they're investing about $550,000 in build-out renovation costs in the space to make it modern, new, and welcoming.
In
Out
12:47
Atmosphere.
In
Out
12:48
Public need for a license is strong at this location.
In
Out
12:53
This is unique, a unique concept for the area.
In
Out
12:55
First of all, it's authentic Asian cuisine and a lively modern atmosphere.
In
Out
13:01
This location, as just mentioned, used to be a TGI Friday's, so this board has actually found that public need existed in the past, and I would, I would posit that the same circumstances that existed for public need when that license was granted, uh, still exists today.
In
Out
13:16
The character and fitness of the applicant is also very strong.
In
Out
13:19
While this is their first Massachusetts operation, the ownership has locations that are successful in Fairfax and Richmond, Virginia, as well as one in Delaware.
In
Out
13:30
And the franchise has 15 locations across New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Texas, as well as other states.
In
Out
13:39
They've never had a violation or disciplinary matter related to alcohol of any kind, and they have a track record of working well within the communities which they serve.
In
Out
13:50
Manager of record will be Michael Wu.
In
Out
13:52
He is a U.S. citizen.
In
Out
13:53
He's a Massachusetts resident.
In
Out
13:55
He's familiar with the rules and regulations related to the sale and service of alcohol of this board, the ABCC, and the laws of the Commonwealth.
In
Out
14:01
And he has experience in the industry, as he has been the head manager of Hook and Reel in Revere, Massachusetts, since 2018, and he's never received a violation or disciplinary action from the local board there or the ABCC.
In
Out
14:18
Okay, sir, you've— you mentioned that they were going to spend some money on renovations and stuff.
In
Out
14:22
Do they have a projected opening?
In
Out
14:25
That would be an operations question.
In
Out
14:27
Is there a projected opening?
In
Out
14:35
We've been getting a lot of, uh, I've seen a lot of questions on social media, people wanting to know.
In
Out
14:41
They've heard, where's it going, what is it, when's it opening, that type thing.
In
Out
14:46
So we're here to answer all those questions.
In
Out
14:50
Absolutely.
In
Out
14:52
That's okay.
In
Out
14:52
Does anybody— when you have it, just let me know.
In
Out
14:55
Anybody on the board have any questions?
In
Out
14:56
Oh, everything looks good.
In
Out
14:58
No, this is a public hearing.
In
Out
14:59
Does— is anybody here to talk in favor of this liquor license?
In
Out
15:07
Is there anybody here that wants to talk against this liquor license?
In
Out
15:13
Seeing no— seeing no one, I'll take a motion to close the public hearing at 6:14 PM.
In
Out
15:20
So moved.
In
Out
15:21
Second.
In
Out
15:26
All those in favor to close the public hearing?
In
Out
15:28
Aye.
In
Out
15:29
Any opposed?
In
Out
15:30
Seeing none, unanimous.
In
Out
15:36
He's still scrolling, he doesn't have it yet.
In
Out
15:43
Okay, who would like to make the motion to allow an all-liquor on-premise liquor license for Ugly Dumpling at 1105 Fall River Avenue?
In
Out
15:52
So moved.
In
Out
15:53
Second.
In
Out
15:54
Okay, I got a motion and a second.
In
Out
15:56
Does anybody else have any questions?
In
Out
15:58
Of the general— I have a question to Sean.
In
Out
16:00
Go ahead, Sean.
In
Out
16:02
With disapproval, do we have to include that promissory note?
In
Out
16:05
Uh, yes.
In
Out
16:05
Okay, of $550,000, correct?
In
Out
16:08
In the motion, can you just add that, Gary?
In
Out
16:10
Sure.
In
Out
16:10
So moved.
In
Out
16:11
Second.
In
Out
16:12
Is it being pledged?
In
Out
16:13
It's not.
In
Out
16:14
Oh, it's not being pledged.
In
Out
16:14
Okay, sorry, it's a no-value license.
In
Out
16:16
Okay, my mistake.
In
Out
16:18
Okay, so your motion is good, your second is good.
In
Out
16:24
Anybody else have any questions?
In
Out
16:27
Of anyone?
In
Out
16:28
Everybody good?
In
Out
16:29
I would just say, if I may, welcome to Seacock and thank you for investing in our community.
In
Out
16:34
Thank you.
In
Out
16:35
Good luck.
In
Out
16:35
And good luck.
In
Out
16:36
And good luck.
In
Out
16:36
Thank you.
In
Out
16:37
Okay, all in favor?
In
Out
16:38
Aye.
In
Out
16:39
Any opposed?
In
Out
16:40
Seeing none, passes unanimously.
In
Out
16:43
Do you have that date for us?
In
Out
16:44
I left my work— I'm sorry, I left my work.
In
Out
16:49
No, that's okay.
In
Out
16:50
I usually try to find out dates, so— sorry, February 23rd.
In
Out
16:53
I just February 23rd, huh?
In
Out
16:57
Okay, so people now won't have to keep talking about it on social media, and we have a prospective date.
In
Out
17:04
Good luck to you.
In
Out
17:04
Good luck to you.
In
Out
17:06
Thank you.
In
Out
17:10
Discussion regarding the placement of advertising billboards along Route 195.
In
Out
17:17
Now let's just hold up a second for them.
In
Out
17:22
John, I'll let you talk first.
In
Out
17:24
You're a town employee, so go get— okay.
In
Out
17:26
Uh, Madam Chair, members of the board, uh, we've been, uh, discussing this item.
In
Out
17:31
I went back and kind of looked at my notes and checked in the files, uh, since 2023.
In
Out
17:36
Uh, our last discussion was last May, I believe.
In
Out
17:39
Uh, at that time we did not have a draft, uh, bylaw in hand.
In
Out
17:45
Uh, Mr. Davis's office has provided that draft bylaw.
In
Out
17:49
We took a look at that over the last few months, and now we've got the draft bylaw in front of us.
In
Out
17:54
I did an analysis for the board kind of identifying a few items that I had of concern, questions, items that would need to be addressed as we go forward.
In
Out
18:05
And then with that, I think now tonight we're discussing whether or not to move forward formally with submitting this, assumedly for the Springtown meeting, I would guess, but obviously that's whatever the board wants to proceed.
In
Out
18:18
Um, would you like me to go through the proposed bylaw?
In
Out
18:21
No, I have a question for you.
In
Out
18:23
Okay, I don't have a copy of that.
In
Out
18:24
Yeah, I don't either.
In
Out
18:25
Oh, you don't have a copy?
In
Out
18:26
I don't think any of us have it.
In
Out
18:27
I had it in my package.
In
Out
18:28
A copy of the bylaw?
In
Out
18:30
There should be.
In
Out
18:31
I submitted a memo, is dated January 21st, with the proposed bylaw attached to it with big draft.
In
Out
18:38
I got minutes, I got minutes, I got lots of minutes.
In
Out
18:41
Yeah, no, I don't.
In
Out
18:52
So none of us got it right?
In
Out
18:54
No.
In
Out
18:54
Okay, nobody got it.
In
Out
18:55
That's all right, John, we can fix it.
In
Out
18:59
Um, the attorney, sir.
In
Out
19:02
Mr. Davis is here from— I forgot your name already.
In
Out
19:07
No, come up here with a chair.
In
Out
19:09
No.
In
Out
19:13
And I, I can— we'll wait till— yeah, that's fine.
In
Out
19:18
But we can talk to this gentleman until he gets back.
In
Out
19:21
Your name again, sir?
In
Out
19:23
Hello again, William Davis from the Law Office of Brainsky Levinson, 1543 Faragrab.
In
Out
19:30
Okay, and you are here to speak in favor of the proposed bylaw and overlay district for the proposed billboard sites.
In
Out
19:41
You've reviewed the bylaw, obviously, because you said you had some with you.
In
Out
19:46
Uh, yes, so I, uh, my office actually drafted the bylaw.
In
Out
19:51
Well, there you go.
In
Out
19:52
And the reason that your office is here is because you basically have clients that want to advertise and benefit from billboards that may be put up.
In
Out
20:02
Correct.
In
Out
20:02
And that client is here with me tonight.
In
Out
20:04
His name is Stephen Ross, and he's with the company American Outside Advertising.
In
Out
20:09
And I'm pretty sure Mr. Davis, or at least somebody from Mr. Davis's office, was here the last time we were here to discuss this, if I'm not mistaken.
In
Out
20:17
Or either way, out of that discussion, we get the draft bylaw.
In
Out
20:21
Yeah, right.
In
Out
20:22
We, uh, we've also had a discussion with Mr. Kadeem as well prior to this meeting.
In
Out
20:26
Yeah, that's fine.
In
Out
20:28
But people like to know why you're here talking to us.
In
Out
20:30
I understand.
In
Out
20:31
And because you have— thank you— you have, you have, um, clients that want to have— you have the billboard company as a client, not necessarily places that want to advertise on the billboard?
In
Out
20:45
Correct.
In
Out
20:46
We, we represent, um, the advertiser.
In
Out
20:49
American Outside Advertising is the name of company.
In
Out
20:52
But they, they are in charge of the billboards?
In
Out
20:56
Correct.
In
Out
20:56
And then if somebody wants to advertise on those billboards, they have to go to them?
In
Out
21:01
Correct.
In
Out
21:02
And they lease the space on which those billboards are built.
In
Out
21:06
So are they like competing with Lamar?
In
Out
21:08
With who?
In
Out
21:09
Lamar.
In
Out
21:10
Lamar.
In
Out
21:11
That's their competitor.
In
Out
21:11
Okay.
In
Out
21:18
So if I just— probably be most valuable just to go through generally the bylaw and my memo, which— but one outlines the bylaw and then 2 just has some additional comments that I had with regard to it.
In
Out
21:28
In general, the bylaw calls for review of the plans in accordance with Section 2.8, which is site plan review.
In
Out
21:36
It calls for the planning board to be the special permit granting authority for the applications.
In
Out
21:44
It provides some additional criteria with regard to the proposed billboards.
In
Out
21:53
Most notably, though, it does not specifically reference the special permit requirements or public hearing requirements, which is one of the comments that I had.
In
Out
22:01
As far as the proposal, it provides for and calls for an overlay district, minimum lot area at 2,500 square feet with frontage of 150 feet.
In
Out
22:13
Billboard size is proposed to be 50-foot tall, 2-sided with 400-square-foot facing sides for each billboard.
In
Out
22:27
That's kind of the— and then otherwise generally consistent with 700 CMR 3, which is Massachusetts Code of Regulations that speaks to highway signage.
In
Out
22:39
With regards to the specific comments that I had, which appear on the 2nd page of the memorandum, my first comment was that the— as a— the zoning board should be the special permit granting authority.
In
Out
22:51
The planning board generally isn't involved with the whether or not a use is permitted.
In
Out
22:57
We're generally involved in how that use gets constructed and developed on a site.
In
Out
23:02
Generally, the zoning board is— it's our town body that handles the yes or no whether or not those decisions should be going forward.
In
Out
23:09
That's generally consistent with our zoning bylaw, and I, in my opinion, should, should stay consistent.
In
Out
23:14
Uh, if the planning board does retain the special permit granting authority, I just recommended that references be made to Section 2.2, which of the zoning bylaw, and Section 2.4, which specifically speak to the special permit, special permits, as well as the public hearing requirements.
In
Out
23:31
And that would just be consistent with our other special permit procedures that the Zoning Board of Appeals currently provides for.
In
Out
23:39
The designation of the bounds of the overlay district would need to be discussed.
In
Out
23:43
That's something obviously we'll probably discuss tonight.
In
Out
23:45
I have taken an initial look at the 195 corridor.
In
Out
23:50
On the eastern side, there are a couple of areas where there are some residentials that approximate to 195 specifically in the Wheaton Avenue area.
In
Out
23:59
And as you move towards the kind of central area, you also have some additional residential there.
In
Out
24:07
As you go to the western side, there's more residential on the northern side, less residential on the southern side.
In
Out
24:13
So I think it would be a question of whether or not we designate the overlay district over, say, highway business and industrial properties, or whether we put Sawtooth type of overlay district or straight up, as we've done in some places with our mixed-use overlay district, 250-foot from whatever road right-of-way that we're speaking to.
In
Out
24:33
The other comments that I had were with regard to just noting the size of the proposed signage and height impacts on residential properties and then some discussion with regard to the setbacks.
In
Out
24:46
Currently, the provisions The proposed bylaw provides for a 10-foot setback from any public right-of-way, 100-foot setback from residentially zoned properties, and offsets between 500 for non-electric and 1,000 feet for electric signage.
In
Out
25:01
My only concern with that would be, how does that interplay with the fall zone of these signs should one happen to fall?
In
Out
25:08
To me, and again, I'm not a sign expert or a civil engineer, but certainly that's something I think we would want to consider if one of these things were to fall.
In
Out
25:16
We want to know where it's falling and that it's not going to fall into an occupied residential structure.
In
Out
25:21
And then finally, comment number 7 was with regard to the fee schedule.
In
Out
25:24
Obviously, if the— if this was adopted, and as we move forward and get closer to town meeting, we'll have to think about a fee schedule to be added to our— to our fee schedule for the proposed highway signs.
In
Out
25:35
Um, that was my analysis.
In
Out
25:38
Uh, as usual, just— I tried to stay kind of generally kind of in the middle and and just provide analysis and not commentary.
In
Out
25:45
But certainly if the Board has any comments, I can answer those, and I'm sure Mr. Davis has some additional comments to make as well.
In
Out
25:55
Yes, go ahead.
In
Out
25:57
If I may, could I just add some context to that, more so on the location side of where these— where we would recommend this overlay district being?
In
Out
26:08
One of the locations that we would strongly recommend is the area near Seekonk Speedway, which I've printed out photographs of, because that particular area does not have any sort of impact on residential homes within 2,000 feet.
In
Out
26:26
So we think that that would probably be an ideal area to designate the particular District.
In
Out
26:33
We also think just generally that adding this, uh, this bylaw or a district therefore would benefit local businesses, allow them to advertise, as well as the possible use of the town itself to advertise things like town meetings, issues regarding weather, Amber Alerts, and just things of that nature.
In
Out
26:58
Um, and at a later date, we could also possibly discuss some sort of community host agreement as far as allowing advertising for the town of Seekonk itself, which we think would also be very beneficial in the, in the long run as well.
In
Out
27:17
And the bylaw does speak to public use of the proposed signage, correct?
In
Out
27:21
Obviously, that would be limited to the electronic signage, right?
In
Out
27:26
And that was the biggest thing.
In
Out
27:28
Electronic signage is bigger, is brighter than a regular billboard most of the time.
In
Out
27:33
And We would like to have it as, as far away from residential as possible, but I understand there'll be limits.
In
Out
27:40
But we need to consider the people who are living in that area so that we— and we discussed about angling the angles of the signs so when that comes on, it doesn't— hopefully doesn't bleed into residential areas because these signs are What is it, 50 feet tall?
In
Out
28:02
Yep, 400 square foot.
In
Out
28:04
And, and the thing is that I'm thinking of too is summertime is different than wintertime because if there's foliage there in the wintertime, it's going to be thinner, so the light's going to be brighter than in the summertime when it gets interfered with, uh, interfered with the, the brush and the trees and everything that would block it.
In
Out
28:25
Just by the way, so this is his Draft, his draft.
In
Out
28:30
You, you have something that you've come up with for the, for the zone, right?
In
Out
28:36
Oh, you'd have to put something together very early on.
In
Out
28:39
And then we kind of switched to this proposed current draft as our kind of baseline to start from.
In
Out
28:46
And I would note that there still are some small changes that may need to be made to the draft, specifically as to height and size regulations.
In
Out
28:54
But what was presented with the map before you is what we believe would be the ideal location for the district.
In
Out
29:02
And I would say my comments and concern are mostly on the procedural side of things with regard to whether or not it's the zoning board that's the special permit-granting authority.
In
Out
29:12
If it's going to be the planning board, then making sure that we reference the special permits and follow the required And though, you know, and obviously the setbacks.
In
Out
29:21
So we're only talking 195 now.
In
Out
29:24
I have obviously, um, old or dated material on this where we were discussing Route 6.
In
Out
29:34
Well, I think you mean— I think we're just kind of talking the Route 6 corridor generally, and it being in the 195 Route 6 corridor, I think we're just going to use those terms.
In
Out
29:44
When I came up, Madam Chair, I was talking about the old Alberts building has a billboard there from back in the day.
In
Out
29:49
The Dowling property had a billboard back in the day.
In
Out
29:52
The structure might even still be there, if I'm not mistaken.
In
Out
29:55
And that's where I was getting to on the western side of that corridor where 195 and Route 6 kind of come together.
In
Out
30:02
The northern side of 195 is really residential along Cole Street.
In
Out
30:09
On the southern side, you've got the, you know, that's all pretty much highway business.
In
Out
30:10
And I would also note that based on the new Massachusetts regulations, that old site that was just mentioned near the Darling Hotel properties wouldn't be suitable anymore.
In
Out
30:22
It wouldn't— proximity to the on-ramp, right?
In
Out
30:26
Yeah, because of the on-ramp location.
In
Out
30:29
When you go to East Providence— oh, different state— they're basically on the on-ramp.
In
Out
30:33
Yeah, let's, let's not mix up here.
In
Out
30:36
One other thing I will say, just for context, I think most the signs that are on 195 currently are electronic signs.
In
Out
30:43
And I think just in general, in the trend of what I've seen traveling around, electronic signs are more the norm now than the old school.
In
Out
30:53
Oh, yeah.
In
Out
30:54
Yeah, I agree with that.
In
Out
30:55
And with the driving that I do, and this is no insult to billboard people, but most of the time, if I look at them for a second, that'd be about it.
In
Out
31:02
Because, you know, Yeah, I think we also spoke one time about the limitation of what could be advertised on here, on the billboards that are located in town.
In
Out
31:16
A touchy subject generally.
In
Out
31:17
So let's touch on it.
In
Out
31:18
Well, generally, Mr. James can speak to this as well as Massachusetts Attorney.
In
Out
31:23
Um, towns cannot regulate and governments cannot regulate the content of signage.
In
Out
31:29
Um, so we can't Say if we adopt this, we can't tell people what they can and cannot put up there.
In
Out
31:35
That can't be a condition of our approval.
In
Out
31:38
So you can't have inappropriate content?
In
Out
31:40
I'll turn it over to the Massachusetts attorney.
In
Out
31:42
Yeah, that would turn into a matter of constitutional law as to free speech, and then also it would be dependent on what kind of content would be allowed by whoever's doing the advertising.
In
Out
31:55
I don't know what kind of experience So does the, does the property owner who would have this on their property have a say in what goes on their billboard?
In
Out
32:05
Because it might represent their property.
In
Out
32:08
You might.
In
Out
32:08
If you're going to say something, you're going to need to move that over, please.
In
Out
32:13
Stephen Ross with American Outside Advertising.
In
Out
32:15
Stephen what, sir?
In
Out
32:16
Ross.
In
Out
32:16
Ross.
In
Out
32:17
Okay.
In
Out
32:18
American Outside Advertising, 105 Sunset Rock Road, Andover, Massachusetts.
In
Out
32:21
Okay, so, so I might move more to you.
In
Out
32:24
There's probably some slack on the system.
In
Out
32:26
Yeah, I think it's probably stuck.
In
Out
32:27
Yeah.
In
Out
32:28
Thank you.
In
Out
32:28
There you go.
In
Out
32:29
Our company will not advertise any sexually orientated businesses.
In
Out
32:34
We won't do any attack ads.
In
Out
32:35
We don't do anything that, you know, is very divisive, such as pro-abortion or pro-life.
In
Out
32:46
We do, you know, we do Budweiser or alcohol.
In
Out
32:52
Um, while the state allows marijuana, we would advertise that as well.
In
Out
32:57
And really everything else, a lot of it is attorneys, car dealerships, restaurants.
In
Out
33:02
It's really run-of-the-mill type of advertisers.
In
Out
33:05
No, that's, that's great, but it— the point had, it had to be brought up because we need to know.
In
Out
33:12
Yes.
In
Out
33:12
And so do the people that are watching, because nobody wants— huh?
In
Out
33:16
I was just saying, in the end, we as a town cannot regulate No, I know, but I still like to hear from the people who, who may or may not have control of it.
In
Out
33:25
I mean, you can't— one sign company though, right?
In
Out
33:28
But you can't, um, you know, nobody wants to go down the road looking at that.
In
Out
33:34
Seaconch doesn't want to go down the road looking at offensive or whatever.
In
Out
33:38
I didn't know what the regulations were.
In
Out
33:40
We can't make the right regulation, but it's nice to hear from the company because we'd be very upset.
In
Out
33:47
Yeah, I would, uh, also just note that something that this might be somewhat comparable to but on a lesser size in this case would be, uh, the Rehoboth billboard off Barney Avenue that does advertise it.
In
Out
34:00
Exactly.
In
Out
34:00
They do a lot of advertising for local companies like J&J Materials, Hillside, as well as town announcements, uh, that sort of thing, and weather alerts.
In
Out
34:09
My thing was more along the triple X stuff.
In
Out
34:11
You know, you have kids in cars, and if so, if we can't regulate it, can the property owner say we don't want that on our property and stuff like that?
In
Out
34:18
You know, that's what I was trying to get at.
In
Out
34:20
Like, they can be kind of— so yes, the property owner can— we can have in a lease where things are prohibited, uh, there, but we wouldn't put that up.
In
Out
34:27
Okay.
In
Out
34:27
No, I'm— yeah, yeah, just had to be said.
In
Out
34:29
Yes, asked.
In
Out
34:31
So were we saying in business district only?
In
Out
34:35
Do I understand that?
In
Out
34:36
I would— all over the board.
In
Out
34:38
Process-wise, I'm imagining that the board's gonna either tell me to take this back to the planning board and work on those specifics as far as what their recommendations are, is who the special permit authority is, where we should do this.
In
Out
34:50
I'd love to have some direction from the board as I do that.
In
Out
34:53
Um, so, and then kind of come back and then formally submit it as, you know, a submission for— so have all of you read what the attorney wrote as far as he We drafted the, um, my comments are based on the draft, right?
In
Out
35:07
Yeah.
In
Out
35:09
So, so my comments with the residential is the town owns a lot of land from Mott and School out to 195 and from Anthony Street a distance down.
In
Out
35:20
So if it was— if then that's all zoned residential, so if it was prohibited, then the town would lose out on some of the revenue.
In
Out
35:29
What's the What's the distance from the on-ramp/off-ramp you said you mentioned?
In
Out
35:33
It's 500 feet from where the dotted line hits the white line.
In
Out
35:38
So 500 feet past that is a, is a minimum, except for if the town has more than 50,000 people, then the ramp rule is nonexistent.
In
Out
35:46
I don't know why.
In
Out
35:47
Okay, trying to think if that comes into play with the Martin School.
In
Out
35:50
Martin School, look, I'm, I'm looking at a map now of that section of 19— the 195 corridor, and it looks to me that it's a about 500 feet, or certainly a portion of the property is.
In
Out
35:59
Um, again, my only concern would be you've got obviously a lot of residential around that Martin School.
In
Out
36:05
So when you go for state approvals, what's the distance between one electronic sign to the next?
In
Out
36:10
Uh, it's 1,000 feet between— and yes, between signs either side of the road.
In
Out
36:15
And I, I looked at the 195 corridor, and the location that we have picked and have a lease with the property owner at Seekonk Speedway, I think it's the only location that meets the state criteria.
In
Out
36:26
So regardless of what your overlay district is, no one else would be able to get a permit.
In
Out
36:31
You wouldn't have proliferation of billboards along the 195 corridor, right?
In
Out
36:34
But that doesn't— that doesn't, um, include— so you can— you can have an electronic sign and then within 1,000 feet you could have one that's not electronic?
In
Out
36:42
Is that— that's my understanding, right?
In
Out
36:44
Yes, 500-foot spacing from, um, uh, for a non-digital sign And then same side of the road, right?
In
Out
36:52
And then 1,000 feet for 2 digitals?
In
Out
36:55
Yes, 1,000-foot spacing between the digitals either side of the road.
In
Out
36:58
Okay.
In
Out
36:58
But another requirement for the state is that you have to have, um, 2 businesses within 500 feet of the sign.
In
Out
37:04
So when you look at what is, um, along the I-95 corridor, there's very, very limited.
In
Out
37:10
I think we have the only location that meets the state criteria.
In
Out
37:15
So I just wanted to point that out there.
In
Out
37:17
There are specifications on how many— like, so if you're looking at, you know, the town-owned property and then, you know, property going down, like, you're going to be limited on how many signs you can get out there.
In
Out
37:26
I'm pretty sure close to the town line on both sides we've got signs existing, but we'd have to have separation up.
In
Out
37:33
That's going to shrink that down.
In
Out
37:35
And those offset and setback requirements are also set forth in Section, uh, 6.2.
In
Out
37:42
12.9.
In
Out
37:42
And I believe those are reiterations of the state requirements.
In
Out
37:46
And I believe that also at that Secon Speedway site, there may still be footings or a foundation for a previous billboard.
In
Out
37:58
Okay, so we need to— we, you, Mr. Orvin, after we tell you, direction, yes, first of all, we have to come up with a billboard overlay district, correct?
In
Out
38:13
Yes.
In
Out
38:13
Well, I, I don't think the select board needs to come up with that district this evening.
In
Out
38:18
I think the select board gives me some direction as to what do we want to focus on— the highway business and the industrial.
In
Out
38:24
Do we want to try to include the Martin School property?
In
Out
38:28
Um, obviously, you know, that kind of direction will help me put that together.
In
Out
38:33
Take a look at where the, the existing signs are, where those buffer is going to be and kind of box it in a little bit based on the, you know, 1,000-foot.
In
Out
38:43
Personally, I'm only thinking of 195.
In
Out
38:46
I'm not thinking of putting any billboards inside the town next to residential or whatever areas.
In
Out
38:52
You know, we have enough problems with that sign bylaw as it runs in the town anyway.
In
Out
38:59
I'm thinking of 195 as only— that's what Martin School is.
In
Out
39:04
That's 195 is what he's talking about.
In
Out
39:07
I see what you're saying.
In
Out
39:08
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
In
Out
39:09
Well, we need to protect Martin School anyway.
In
Out
39:11
I can drop in that area a couple of iterations, see what it looks like under a couple of those scenarios, right?
In
Out
39:17
Bring it back to the planning board if that's what the— or I can bring it back to the select board first, whatever you guys want to do.
In
Out
39:23
If you came up with a plan that showed, say, the maximum footprint, and then we can back it out from there.
In
Out
39:30
Oh, what?
In
Out
39:31
Yeah, based on state law.
In
Out
39:33
Yeah, I can do it with the highway business in the industrial.
In
Out
39:36
I can do it with just a straight 300 feet off of 195, and I can do it a little more kind of sawtooth, right?
In
Out
39:41
All right, that's good.
In
Out
39:42
We'll have those 3 options.
In
Out
39:44
You have, uh, your number one thing is the zoning board should be the special permit granting authority.
In
Out
39:49
Sounds good to me.
In
Out
39:51
Just only for the fact that the planning board doesn't usually do— if they do, how in the zoning board generally, as Mr. DeGarde said.
In
Out
39:59
That's— yeah, my preference would be to come back to the select board first.
In
Out
40:04
Yeah.
In
Out
40:04
And then submit it for a formal review.
In
Out
40:06
Yes, because we want all, all these things.
In
Out
40:08
We want to know what the district is and that.
In
Out
40:10
And thank you for being here because you answered some of my questions.
In
Out
40:15
Nothing against you, sir.
In
Out
40:17
Has our lawyers reviewed this?
In
Out
40:19
Uh, no, I don't think so.
In
Out
40:21
There's nothing really.
In
Out
40:22
Do they have to?
In
Out
40:22
They have a lawyer.
In
Out
40:24
We got lawyers.
In
Out
40:24
Do we have to review this at some point once, once it's drafted?
In
Out
40:27
All right, if the board's all right with the comments that I made, I'll make those changes into the bylaw.
In
Out
40:33
We can send it to town council for their comments.
In
Out
40:35
I'll loop in Mr. Davis and we'll go come back in a month or so.
In
Out
40:38
Yeah, and with the goal to try to get on to spring town meeting.
In
Out
40:42
Oh, that's fine, that's fine.
In
Out
40:44
That's, that's— yeah, keeping the goal.
In
Out
40:47
No, that's good.
In
Out
40:47
And John, when you come back, could we have, um, all that documentation presentation before the meeting so we have a chance?
In
Out
40:53
Yeah, yeah, we do have some scheduling issues.
In
Out
40:55
That's okay.
In
Out
40:56
Thank you, bud.
In
Out
40:57
Identified where they— yeah, you'll do, you'll do a drawing too.
In
Out
41:00
I'm gonna— yeah, actually I've already got the, the maps kind of roughed out.
In
Out
41:04
Yeah, I'm just going to take tonight's discussion and lay them out on here.
In
Out
41:06
Yeah, just make sure we have everything for next time, John.
In
Out
41:10
So, uh, next time, so we can understand it, John.
In
Out
41:15
So we can understand it, John.
In
Out
41:17
Okay, you get that?
In
Out
41:18
Well, I don't know.
In
Out
41:18
I can't speak to the understanding.
In
Out
41:21
Come on.
In
Out
41:22
Have a good night, everyone.
In
Out
41:24
Thank you.
In
Out
41:24
Thank you very much.
In
Out
41:26
Thank you.
In
Out
41:29
Okay, so they're gonna come back, so that's good.
In
Out
41:33
Second quarter budget presentation.
In
Out
41:38
That's all right, don't worry about that.
In
Out
41:39
Thank you.
In
Out
41:40
We'll figure it out.
In
Out
41:41
Thank you.
In
Out
41:44
All right.
In
Out
41:47
Thank you, Madam Chair.
In
Out
41:47
So just the second quarter budget update.
In
Out
41:50
So to date for the second quarter, the budget still remains balanced with no major issues identified.
In
Out
41:58
Our salaries are trending below budget forecasts.
In
Out
42:01
We'll get into that a little bit more.
In
Out
42:03
Our expenditures are trending below target overall for the second quarter as well.
In
Out
42:08
Our revenues are trending slightly below budget projections, but no real concerns there.
In
Out
42:14
As the board knows, we just did the tax recap in November.
In
Out
42:18
So the tax classification was held on November 12th.
In
Out
42:22
The recap was submitted and approved by the DOR on November 18th.
In
Out
42:26
So it was a quick turnaround time.
In
Out
42:28
Our actual real estate bills were mailed by the December deadline, which represent the 3rd and 4th quarter bills.
In
Out
42:40
For the assessor's office, our new growth was certified at $642,174.
In
Out
42:46
We had anticipated $500,000 for new growth leading up to the preparation of the budget, so $142,000 higher than we budgeted, which was good.
In
Out
42:58
In that breakdown, residential property valuations— residential equated to 50.8% of that new growth value.
In
Out
43:09
Personal property was 38.8%, and then commercial represented 15.4% of that new growth certification from the DOR.
In
Out
43:18
The FY25 average real estate value increased by 7%.
In
Out
43:23
So the single-family average real estate value is $558,474.
In
Out
43:31
Again, that's up 7% from fiscal year '25.
In
Out
43:34
The average single-family tax bill based on this is $6,852.
In
Out
43:41
That's an increase of $406.
In
Out
43:44
So the single-family parcels, we have 5,107, and the SECONC income per capita is $48,536.
In
Out
43:52
So comparing that to the state average for a single-family tax bill, this State average is $8,114.
In
Out
44:01
That increased by $384 at the state level.
In
Out
44:05
Uh, the state average single-family assessed value increased, uh, by 5.7%, uh, compared to the 7% for SECONC values, uh, and the new assessed value is $743,136.
In
Out
44:20
That $48,000 figure, do you know how much that increased over last year?
In
Out
44:25
I'm sorry, which figure?
In
Out
44:26
The income per capita.
In
Out
44:28
Oh, I do not know.
In
Out
44:29
I can get that for you though.
In
Out
44:30
Okay.
In
Out
44:33
Yeah, then moving on to the Treasurer's Office.
In
Out
44:36
Uh, so as the board is aware, the revenue components, uh, 9.4% is equated to other revenue, uh, just under 70% is property tax, 12.4% comes from state aid, and then 8.6% is coming from local receipts.
In
Out
44:52
Uh, the Treasurer's Office, uh, for insurance, uh, worked with our, um, our insurance company, um, MEGA Omega— not our trash haulers, different company— uh, to do the FY24 workers' compensation audit, which was completed with no, no issues.
In
Out
45:08
Uh, we also submitted by, by the deadline, uh, the required deadline of December 15th, our health insurance responsibility disclosures.
In
Out
45:16
Uh, the Collector's Office issued, uh, 1,008, uh, disposal demands.
In
Out
45:23
So that's about 18% of the total, uh, tax, uh, disposal bills that went out for FY26.
In
Out
45:30
And then they also liened 272 for FY25 unpaid disposal, uh, bills that were placed on the FY26 real estate bill.
In
Out
45:40
Before you skip over, it says the workman's comp audit completed with no outstanding issues.
In
Out
45:46
Yep.
In
Out
45:46
So basically, I mean, there was some issues, but they were minimal and were corrected?
In
Out
45:52
Uh, no, no, no, there were no outstanding issues.
In
Out
45:55
So that means there were no issues?
In
Out
45:56
There were no issues.
In
Out
45:57
Yeah.
In
Out
45:58
Okay.
In
Out
45:59
All right, sounds better.
In
Out
46:01
Okay.
In
Out
46:01
Because, because if there's no outstanding, there may be some that— okay, thanks.
In
Out
46:06
And then the FY26 tax bills, as I mentioned, went out.
In
Out
46:09
Uh, those represent 3rd and 4th quarter for the actual bills.
In
Out
46:18
Then moving on to the tax title.
In
Out
46:20
So we had 39 parcels in tax title.
In
Out
46:24
We had a reduction in our installer installment agreements that went down by 1, and then we added 2 additional foreclosure cases going through Land Court.
In
Out
46:36
The revenue summary.
In
Out
46:40
So as I mentioned earlier, we're slightly below in some of the areas.
In
Out
46:44
The major category is going to be our real estate.
In
Out
46:47
So we're at 47.2%.
In
Out
46:48
So as a rule of thumb, we collect about 98%, and then everything else goes obviously to tax title.
In
Out
46:55
But when we're doing our budgeting forecast for revenue, we budget 100% because at some point we are going to collect 100%.
In
Out
47:01
Percent, whether it's through tax title or through the collection.
In
Out
47:04
But again, slightly below target at the 47.2%.
In
Out
47:08
Again, we're typically about 2% that we still have to collect through tax title.
In
Out
47:14
Personal property has— is slightly ahead of our schedule at 50.5%.
In
Out
47:19
The commitment there is $3.7 million.
In
Out
47:21
We've collected $1.86 million.
In
Out
47:23
I'll go back to the real estate because I didn't mention that piece.
In
Out
47:25
The commitment on the real estate is $52.4 million, and through the second quarter we received $24.7 million.
In
Out
47:35
Motor vehicle excise— our commitment is below target.
In
Out
47:39
We have just over $3 million in commitment for that.
In
Out
47:42
Year-to-date receipts is $364,000.
In
Out
47:45
Our larger commitment is in February, so that's when we'll get the, the big commitments, and then the several other smaller commitments, but by the third quarter, we'll really get a feel for whether or not we're going to meet our target.
In
Out
47:58
Local receipts, the commitment is $1.8 million.
In
Out
48:01
Year-to-date receipts collected is $466,000, so 58.4%.
In
Out
48:06
That's ahead of target.
In
Out
48:08
That doesn't make— that doesn't add up, does it?
In
Out
48:11
What's that?
In
Out
48:12
If the target's $1.8 million and you're at $466,000, you're not even halfway there.
In
Out
48:17
Oh, maybe I had it— Maybe I had a typo.
In
Out
48:19
Maybe it should have been 9.
In
Out
48:22
Where's the 4?
In
Out
48:23
1, 2, 3, 4.
In
Out
48:23
Yeah, it might have been like an 8 or a 9 or a 7.
In
Out
48:26
I'll double-check that.
In
Out
48:28
But the percentage— and I can get it quickly.
In
Out
48:31
I'm sorry.
In
Out
48:31
It's supposed to be ahead of— so the percentage is correct?
In
Out
48:34
The percentage is correct, yes.
In
Out
48:36
Yeah, I might have just transposed it.
In
Out
48:37
So it's 58.4% of $1,865,100 that we need to— yeah, it's close to 9.
In
Out
48:43
Yeah.
In
Out
48:45
And then on the meals tax, uh, we had a commitment of $690,000.
In
Out
48:54
Year-to-date receipts, $369,000 collected.
In
Out
48:56
That's ahead of target, 53.6%.
In
Out
48:59
Hotel tax, uh, $800,000.
In
Out
49:01
Uh, year-to-date receipts through the second quarter coming in at $490,000.
In
Out
49:05
And then our marijuana tax is slightly below target, uh, so we're at $810, for the commitment for the year, coming in at 47.7%.
In
Out
49:16
But as you said, the next revenue summary that we get will, will be closer to target, right?
In
Out
49:23
Correct.
In
Out
49:23
And then the real— it's a lot of below, that's why I'm— and then we'll get, we'll get some fluctuation.
In
Out
49:28
We'll probably get a little bit more collection in the real estate tax, especially if there are going to be abatements.
In
Out
49:32
You have to pay your real estate bills in order to apply for abatement which is due by February 1st.
In
Out
49:38
So we'll see that number increase.
In
Out
49:40
Yep.
In
Out
49:41
Okay.
In
Out
49:42
The marijuana tax, we're taking a beating, huh?
In
Out
49:44
A little bit.
In
Out
49:45
Yeah.
In
Out
49:45
Yeah.
In
Out
49:48
So here is just the total salaries and expenses.
In
Out
49:51
A couple of areas just to highlight.
In
Out
49:54
So public safety coming in at 54.2%.
In
Out
49:57
So what's really driving that is just the police department for expenses.
In
Out
50:01
So we paid up lease payments in the beginning of the fiscal year, and then we also paid the Flock camera software system up front.
In
Out
50:09
So that was about $60,000.
In
Out
50:12
If you recall, we actually had the, the Flock camera software was paid for OPER the prior year.
In
Out
50:17
So this is the first year that it was actually in the budget.
In
Out
50:20
So that is driving that expense up a little bit more.
In
Out
50:23
I'll also point out that Flock cameras have gotten a lot of headlines over the last month or so with the Brown shooting and, you know, the use of the flock cameras.
In
Out
50:33
So we've got a number of flock cameras in town, and we have access to that system as well.
In
Out
50:38
So it was very beneficial and continues to be beneficial for the police department.
In
Out
50:43
Education— it's exactly where we anticipated it to be, 60.6%.
In
Out
50:48
But when you're looking at the, you know, quarter 2, you sometimes just go down looking at 50%.
In
Out
50:54
But we paid Bristol County 100% of our assessment, and we're just over 50% for tri-county on the assessment there.
In
Out
51:02
Debt and interest, same thing, 51.1%.
In
Out
51:05
We just made the payments accordingly, so we don't anticipate being over budget on that.
In
Out
51:10
And then other fixed costs coming in at 66.8%, again, based on our forecasting, is on target.
In
Out
51:17
Pension was paid in full at the beginning of the year so we don't get hit with an interest payment if we do 2 different payments over the fiscal year.
In
Out
51:25
And then we also fully funded our liability insurance.
In
Out
51:29
So that's what's driving that.
In
Out
51:32
And then moving over to the quarterly performance for budgeted salaries.
In
Out
51:37
So for the 2nd quarter, we would— we should be at $8.1 million.
In
Out
51:40
We're actually at $7.5 million.
In
Out
51:41
So as I mentioned before, below budgeted salaries, again due to vacancies.
In
Out
51:46
So DPW currently has 3 vacancies that need to be filled.
In
Out
51:51
The fire department currently has 3 that we're looking to fill.
In
Out
51:56
We also have one individual who's out on IOD that we're going through the process for disability retirement, so that could potentially add another vacancy.
In
Out
52:05
Police department is— all their vacancies are filled.
In
Out
52:08
However, we have 4 individuals who are not being paid because they're going through the academy, and we're doing background on that.
In
Out
52:14
So that's contributing to the surplus in the salary account.
In
Out
52:19
For budgeted expense, $15.2 million for— forecasted for the second quarter.
In
Out
52:25
Actual coming in at $14.4 million.
In
Out
52:28
So again, below what our overall projections are.
In
Out
52:32
So for salaries, 46% expended with a surplus of $647,000.
In
Out
52:38
Thousand anticipated for quarter 2.
In
Out
52:40
And then expenses, 59.6% expended, uh, with an expense surplus of $797,000, uh, for quarter 2.
In
Out
52:51
Open it up to questions.
In
Out
52:52
Fantastic.
In
Out
52:53
Oh, thank you.
In
Out
52:54
No, thank you.
In
Out
52:58
Anyone have any other questions than what's already gone through?
In
Out
53:02
Everybody good?
In
Out
53:04
Okay, and you are good too, right?
In
Out
53:06
I am.
In
Out
53:07
Yep.
In
Out
53:07
Okay, discussion to consider putting the South End Fire Station on the upcoming town election ballot.
In
Out
53:15
Now, I for one asked for a legal opinion on doing this, um, so I will give it to you.
In
Out
53:25
Town meeting by a 2/3 vote appropriates the funds for a particular purpose.
In
Out
53:29
Purpose and authorizes the borrowing.
In
Out
53:32
Only the select board, by a 2/3 vote, can put a debt exclusion question on the ballot.
In
Out
53:37
There is no mechanism for either town meeting or voters via petition to place a debit— a debt exclusion question on the ballot.
In
Out
53:46
The sequence in which the town meeting and election occurs does not matter.
In
Out
53:51
Either one can take place before the other, and the question of how to present to the voters is a matter of strategy, i.e., where is there likely to be more opposition and how should that be addressed through the sequencing of the town meeting or election votes.
In
Out
54:07
But the select board must vote to approve, and the town clerk must receive written notice of the full text of the question to be placed on the ballot at least 35 days before the date of the regular or special town election at which the question will appear.
In
Out
54:23
There is no limit on the number of times that the town can present a debt exclusion question to the voters, so long as the steps required all occur at least 35 days prior to the election.
In
Out
54:37
However, if the town meeting vote is contingent upon approval of the ballot question, the ballot question must be approved no later than 90 days following an appropriation made at a special town meeting, or no later than September 15th following an appropriation made at an annual town meeting, in order for the appropriation to be valid.
In
Out
55:00
Now, I asked for this because I thought that this would be the 3rd time that a question on the South End Fire Station would be put before the town— twice at town meeting, and then this would be the 3rd one.
In
Out
55:14
And I know in some instances that, that, well, I just found out for zoning purposes, um, it's if you put something before town meeting and it's voted down, then you can't put it before town, the town again for 2 years.
In
Out
55:28
So I wanted to make sure that if, if this goes on as a, uh, a ballot question, that we weren't violating any time restraints or restrictions.
In
Out
55:39
So That's why I had asked for this.
In
Out
55:42
So now we know this.
In
Out
55:43
So if, if the board votes to put it on a ballot, that it is legal to do it that way.
In
Out
55:49
I just want to make sure that everybody knows that up front.
In
Out
55:54
Okay, so clarify one statement you made.
In
Out
55:58
If you denied zoning change, there is a 2-year window unless you go back to the planning board and convince them that there's significant changes and you can go prior to the 2 years.
In
Out
56:15
Okay, but right now we're not talking about zoning, right?
In
Out
56:17
You would know about that.
In
Out
56:18
Yes.
In
Out
56:19
And seeing as you asked to have this put on, go, your turn.
In
Out
56:22
Okay.
In
Out
56:24
The whole process of the Sultan Fire Station began with this board 6 years ago doing a feasibility study and asking the townspeople to appropriate $425,000 for design.
In
Out
56:38
That now, with the interest and everything, the taxpayers have invested about half a million dollars into those plans that are like many others in the basement, just gaining dust.
In
Out
56:50
But with the Permit Extension Act, which allows those plans to still be valid we can use the plans that have— basically, it's a shovel-ready project.
In
Out
57:07
The need is more than there.
In
Out
57:09
That was confirmed in the feasibility study commissioned by this board.
In
Out
57:15
And I think the townspeople have the right to act and vote fully if they want the South End fire— I get calls all the time for people asking if what's going to happen with the Sultan Fire Station.
In
Out
57:30
And I said, well, hopefully we'll, we'll move it forward.
In
Out
57:33
So it costs us nothing to put it on the ballot, and it's a question that needs to be answered.
In
Out
57:43
And you don't consider going to town meeting twice and having it voted down as answering your question?
In
Out
57:48
The question?
In
Out
57:49
Well, in answer to that We went the first time and we got a majority vote, 51 to 49, but it wasn't two-thirds.
In
Out
57:56
We went the second time and we got 65-35, but we lost it by 7 votes.
In
Out
58:01
All right, and I still say it was outside interference to that, but that's okay.
In
Out
58:05
But this board that was so hot on a $40 million DPW, you got denied at town meeting at 58%, and you still went forward 2 weeks later, and then the town's people by a vote of 82 to 18 said no.
In
Out
58:19
So if it's fair for the DPW that failed at town meeting to go forward and let the townspeople vote on— I say the fire station, which is not a want, it's a need— that we owe it to the taxpayers to let them decide once and for all.
In
Out
58:37
And then certainly if it, if it wins, then it would have to be brought back to a subsequent town meeting for funding.
In
Out
58:49
So in the ballot question, you're not going to put any dollar amount?
In
Out
58:53
We were told that you can't.
In
Out
58:54
You can't.
In
Out
58:55
Okay, so is the question— the ballot question already written up somewhere?
In
Out
59:00
Sometimes this is done ahead of time, so that's what— that's why I'm asking.
In
Out
59:04
It would be basically the same ballot question that you had for the library.
In
Out
59:08
Just change library to fire station.
In
Out
59:14
Am I correct on that?
In
Out
59:15
Yeah, either DBW library.
In
Out
59:17
Yeah, they're pretty much similar.
In
Out
59:19
So basically, what would the question be?
In
Out
59:21
Not that it would be— I— you don't have to give me— no, no.
In
Out
59:23
So, so whether or not you would support— and I, I forget exactly, uh, it's probably a Proposition 2.5 override for the particular project.
In
Out
59:31
The address would be there.
In
Out
59:32
No dollar amount can be put on it.
In
Out
59:34
The it's just a state requirement.
In
Out
59:35
The state sees any type of dollar amount as almost advocating for a project and not advocating for a project.
In
Out
59:41
It's supposed to be neutral.
In
Out
59:43
So there's, there's no dollar amount.
In
Out
59:44
That's essentially what it would say.
In
Out
59:45
Okay, so basically, it would be a vote of interest in whether to move forward with a South End fire station.
In
Out
59:52
But then after that, if it passes at the ballot, it has to come back to town meeting floor.
In
Out
59:59
Yes, because so there's 2— everybody kind of takes both votes as, as being the same vote.
In
Out
1:00:04
They're 2 separate, completely separate votes.
In
Out
1:00:06
So, so town meeting is voting on an appropriation and the authorization for bonding, and then the ballot question is saying that we're gonna do— if you, if you want to do a debt exclusion, an override, you have to get the override by the voters.
In
Out
1:00:20
So 2 separate, completely requests.
In
Out
1:00:24
So what, what he would be requesting is, is the fact that this project would be supported by a debt exclusion.
In
Out
1:00:29
If that passes, then you can go to town meeting saying we've got support for a debt exclusion.
In
Out
1:00:33
You would be asking town meeting to support the project now at that point, which the dollar amount would be associated with that because you need the appropriation and the authorization by 2/3 because it's borrowing for the ability to go out and bond.
In
Out
1:00:49
And then if that passes, then it's Done.
In
Out
1:00:52
Then it's up to the board.
In
Out
1:00:53
I mean, at that point, it's the board's decision whether or not the project moves forward.
In
Out
1:00:56
But we've got all the— we've got all the approvals that we need.
In
Out
1:00:59
We've got the authorization, we've got the appropriation, and then we got the approval for debt exclusion.
In
Out
1:01:06
Anybody else anything?
In
Out
1:01:13
So I will tell you right out, I approve— I support a South End fire station.
In
Out
1:01:22
I do not support the building or the cost that was given at our last town meeting.
In
Out
1:01:26
Um, I know the design, it was designed for a little bit more than what's going to go in it because the original design was for not only the fire station but to have the communications department in it, and they— that was removed.
In
Out
1:01:45
Um, and I, I think it was like $9 million or what was it?
In
Out
1:01:49
It was millions of dollars because of the complexity of the communications department.
In
Out
1:01:56
But the design hasn't changed.
In
Out
1:01:58
It's still the same.
In
Out
1:01:59
And we were told at the time, at the last town meeting, $10 million— $9 million.
In
Out
1:02:04
And that's where my sticking point is because I've been involved in building projects and I don't believe you can build the building that you have designed for $9 million.
In
Out
1:02:16
But that's me.
In
Out
1:02:18
So go ahead.
In
Out
1:02:19
Yes, so that figure of $9.45 million— I met with the chairman of the building committee, Mr. Tosino, who was actively in construction and runs a fairly sized, large-sized construction company, and he said a lot of costs have come down, and he still feels strongly that it can be done for that amount.
In
Out
1:02:41
But in fairness, because this has been going on for so long, if it passes at the ballot, I think the prudent thing to do is before it goes to town meeting is to rebid it just so that we know exactly what we're asking for, because that would make the most— well, yeah, that, that would be a given, I would think.
In
Out
1:02:59
Yep.
In
Out
1:03:00
Actually, um, I forgot something.
In
Out
1:03:04
Anybody else got anything?
In
Out
1:03:05
I thought of something else and now I forgot it.
In
Out
1:03:07
The only thing I have is, um, if this goes to a town-wide vote and it passes and we go back to town meeting and it, it finds a way to pass without changing our current plan that we have— what plan do we have?
In
Out
1:03:23
We haven't talked about staffing, we haven't talked about anything.
In
Out
1:03:24
Those are the issues why it failed the last time, in my opinion.
In
Out
1:03:28
Um, nothing's changed.
In
Out
1:03:29
We haven't discussed it.
In
Out
1:03:30
We don't even know what the budget outlook for next year is going to be.
In
Out
1:03:34
You just heard during the presentation from Mr. Gadeem, we're down 3 firefighters.
In
Out
1:03:37
We have another one that's possibly a disability.
In
Out
1:03:39
So there's 4.
In
Out
1:03:40
That's almost half of a group, just to get us back to square one.
In
Out
1:03:43
We haven't even addressed the issue of the current staffing levels at the 2 stations that we have.
In
Out
1:03:48
We haven't even looked at, are we going to be able to even afford— I don't know what the— I mean, where the budget's going to be.
In
Out
1:03:55
If we're going to be able to afford any firefighters for next year.
In
Out
1:03:58
So there's a lot of questions that we have to ask.
In
Out
1:04:00
So we're going to go to— we're going to go to a town-wide vote, get the consensus of the town, go to a town meeting again with what plan?
In
Out
1:04:05
What has changed since September?
In
Out
1:04:07
What's changed since June?
In
Out
1:04:09
That's where my concern is.
In
Out
1:04:10
I said this before and I'll say it again and again, we need to have a better plan than just winging it because this is what we want, right?
In
Out
1:04:20
And we haven't discussed it, dude.
In
Out
1:04:21
There's no set plan in place.
In
Out
1:04:23
And I would hate to see you go through a town-wide vote, go to another town meeting, have the same discussions that we have, and we sit there with no fucking— no freaking answers.
In
Out
1:04:34
Well, the— my answer to that— no, my answer to that is if the town votes for it and they want to, we have to budget for more firefighters because we're not going to— we are not going to be putting firefighters' lives in danger just to get a fire station down the South End.
In
Out
1:04:50
But this isn't going to happen tomorrow either because things take forever around here.
In
Out
1:04:55
So we're talking years in advance.
In
Out
1:04:57
I received— we have us— did you redo the staffing mod— yeah, model?
In
Out
1:05:03
Because I've got old staffing models here that we've gotten along the way about how many people that he's gonna, uh, that the fire department's gonna have or have have.
In
Out
1:05:16
So we did have— we actually had a meeting today, myself, the chief, the deputy chief, the finance director, and then the assistant TA/HR director to discuss staffing levels.
In
Out
1:05:28
So the chief has a number of staffing levels.
In
Out
1:05:30
We're actually just going to be tweaking— I don't know, Chief, if you want to come down, but we're going to be tweaking some of the information that he presented to us.
In
Out
1:05:39
But we're looking at a comprehensive presentation to the board.
In
Out
1:05:42
So one, just talking about the 2 stations that we currently have, the staffing levels that we need to get to based on what the chief is recommending.
In
Out
1:05:49
We currently have 4 new hires that has been put into the current budget.
In
Out
1:05:54
Again, they're just an initial department budget that was put in.
In
Out
1:05:59
We won't know what the budget looks like for FY27.
In
Out
1:06:03
The governor's numbers should be coming out this Friday.
In
Out
1:06:05
So we'll probably have a better understanding, at least initially, what we're looking at for local aid.
In
Out
1:06:09
So that's really going to kind of drive a lot of our conversation moving forward in terms of what we can and cannot afford.
In
Out
1:06:16
But part of our conversation that we had today was, one, not looking at the fire department in a silo, right?
In
Out
1:06:21
So we need to look at the total cost and the operating costs for the entire, the entire town.
In
Out
1:06:26
So we're going to be looking at, you know, a 5-year to 10-year forecast that will identify exactly based on the model that he is projecting that will be presented to the board, and if supported by the board, how we get there over a 3-year period to cover the 2 stations.
In
Out
1:06:43
And then concurrently, we'll have a second forecast, 5 to 10 year, with that model in place, and then also what it looks like with the impacts of a South End fire station.
In
Out
1:06:52
So again, if we're going debt exclusion, a majority of that cost is going to be on burden of additional taxes, so that's not necessarily coming out of the operating budget.
In
Out
1:07:02
But what will come out of the operating budget is the cost to obviously maintain the building, the equipment associated with it, and the additional staffing.
In
Out
1:07:09
So that's what we're currently looking at, and we'll have that projected as well based on the staffing models that the chief will be making a presentation, a recommendation to the board.
In
Out
1:07:19
So I don't want to put words in the chief's mouth in terms of when we think we can get that done, but I would say that either the next meeting or the meeting after that, we should probably be able to have a presentation to the board.
In
Out
1:07:32
If I could, to Michael's point, I absolutely agree we've got to come up with a plan.
In
Out
1:07:38
And if we pass this in April, I'm not saying let's go to the May town meeting.
In
Out
1:07:44
The soonest I would think would maybe be November town meeting, the fall town meeting.
In
Out
1:07:49
Let's have a plan.
In
Out
1:07:50
We were going to have a discussion last last fall, and that fell apart, which is unfortunate.
In
Out
1:07:56
But I agree, we need a plan, whatever it is.
In
Out
1:08:00
We need a plan.
In
Out
1:08:01
But the plan should have never been to even ask the taxpayers to spend— waste half a million dollars if you were going to go forward with building the building.
In
Out
1:08:09
And you know, the— when we left, walked out of the town meeting, I'll have to say this, the police chief came up to me and shook my hand, and he said, well, I guess they there goes my training room, because we had suggested like an outpost or an area down there.
In
Out
1:08:23
So I— there's a, there's a dual purpose for that building, and we're never going to build it any cheaper than we can now.
In
Out
1:08:28
And I think the time is now to move forward.
In
Out
1:08:35
6 years ago when this was all proposed, I thought we'd be in a lot different spot than what we were.
In
Out
1:08:39
We were talking about hiring 4 firefighters a year to bring up I believe it was 12 to 16 to bring up our current staffing, and then we could— by the time this was built, we'd have enough to occupy the down south.
In
Out
1:08:53
There was too many competing issues at the time.
In
Out
1:08:55
Teachers were talking about getting laid off.
In
Out
1:08:57
There was other departments that had needs, so it didn't go through.
In
Out
1:09:01
And so we couldn't bring on the firefighters.
In
Out
1:09:02
I was hoping this year we could bring on 8, possibly, just to get our current 2 stations up to staffing.
In
Out
1:09:08
As far as the DPW, we all know that building's not good.
In
Out
1:09:11
That's why we moved forward with it, because that was the— that is a move-in ready.
In
Out
1:09:15
If you build DPW tomorrow, we have the staffing, everyone to put into it, and that can be operational.
In
Out
1:09:20
That's the biggest need.
In
Out
1:09:21
That thing's condemned.
In
Out
1:09:22
It's a piece of shit.
In
Out
1:09:23
Everyone knows that.
In
Out
1:09:25
That was the main priority at the time.
In
Out
1:09:27
So as far as this, the firefighters, I mean, you want to build a building, we aren't where we were, where we thought we were going to be from 6 years ago.
In
Out
1:09:35
We just don't have the staff.
In
Out
1:09:37
So you're going to be running everyone thinner and thinner unless you want to build it, and then we're going to automatically hire 16 firefighters tomorrow.
In
Out
1:09:45
That's my thought.
In
Out
1:09:45
But people just open up their tax bills, and if you see online, they weren't too happy about it.
In
Out
1:09:49
And you know, and I don't want to strike a nerve, and with all due respect to you, your department in Fall River for years screamed about manpower.
In
Out
1:09:58
10 people died, and then all of a sudden they found the money.
In
Out
1:10:01
Typically what happens, you know, I've lived in this town a long time and you guys could probably remember it.
In
Out
1:10:07
Anthony Street and Route 6 was the worst intersection in southern New England, and it took a few people to die, then the state came and fixed it.
In
Out
1:10:14
So we've got to address this.
In
Out
1:10:16
We've got to be proactive rather than reactive.
In
Out
1:10:19
And I mean, yes, 6 years down the road, where are you going to be in 6 years?
In
Out
1:10:22
Who knows?
In
Out
1:10:23
But we got to address it.
In
Out
1:10:25
It's, it's a need.
In
Out
1:10:26
I mean, public safety.
In
Out
1:10:27
It should be number one.
In
Out
1:10:28
I get it, but when you have teachers that were getting laid off saying it's a need, we need to teach the kids, our staffing window went out and our money went from us to the schools.
In
Out
1:10:37
So we didn't have the staffing of where we thought we were going to be.
In
Out
1:10:41
So I say it costs— all it costs is your vote.
In
Out
1:10:45
Let the taxpayers decide.
In
Out
1:10:47
I, I don't understand why this board has a problem with letting the people that elected them make the decision.
In
Out
1:10:53
That makes no sense to me because they say we, we're just going to be putting the thing on the ballot until we get the answer we want.
In
Out
1:10:59
We're not satisfied with the no vote, just keep ramming it down the resident's throat.
In
Out
1:11:03
But we've already done town meeting.
In
Out
1:11:04
We haven't done it twice.
In
Out
1:11:06
Twice.
In
Out
1:11:06
Twice.
In
Out
1:11:07
Without the second time, they already— without the support of this board.
In
Out
1:11:10
And if Tom Benoit— if Tom Benoit was here, we tell you it took him 3 times to go to the ballot to get the North School project Done.
In
Out
1:11:18
Oh, that was way before my time.
In
Out
1:11:19
But we don't have the staffing to put in it.
In
Out
1:11:21
We could build the building, it's 2 years down the road.
In
Out
1:11:23
It's 2 years.
In
Out
1:11:24
You're gonna be prepared in 2 years to put— you're absolutely right— I don't even know, 8, 12, 16 just to run that station, plus get Station 1 and 2 on board and fully staffed.
In
Out
1:11:35
We thought we had a plan 6 years ago.
In
Out
1:11:37
I did.
In
Out
1:11:37
We just, we just didn't get there.
In
Out
1:11:39
Like I said, we had teachers literally in front of us crying about they were going to get laid off And they were blaming the Board of Selectmen.
In
Out
1:11:45
We had no say in that.
In
Out
1:11:47
So money went from one thing to the other.
In
Out
1:11:49
To my view, reality of it, if you vote no, you're denying the taxpayers their due process.
In
Out
1:11:56
I'll vote present.
In
Out
1:11:58
Good.
In
Out
1:11:58
Well, you can do that if you'd like.
In
Out
1:12:04
Miss Cozy, you guys have all said very good things, and I agree with each and every one of you.
In
Out
1:12:09
I, I, you know, we sit here every year with a budget and things have to get cut.
In
Out
1:12:14
And like you said, for 6 years you've been saying you're going to put firefighters on.
In
Out
1:12:17
I've been here for 3 and we've been doing the same thing.
In
Out
1:12:19
And every year when the budget comes before us, they're like one of the first things cut.
In
Out
1:12:23
So, you know, and DPW is part of safety too.
In
Out
1:12:26
I mean, public safety, you know, they're not riding around in rescues and police cars, but they're out there shovel, you know, plowing the streets and maintaining the buildings and So, you know, they're a priority as well.
In
Out
1:12:37
So I really don't have anything different to say than what you guys have already said.
In
Out
1:12:43
I can't see building a building that's going to be understaffed and then— or have to understaff every other— or the existing buildings to try and put people, you know, in a new one.
In
Out
1:12:54
So, well, my thought would be that if it went to ballot and it got voted in, then that the town's the town wants to have the other fire station, that it has to be a priority, priority for us over the next 2 or 3 years to build up the staffing at the fire department.
In
Out
1:13:12
And yes, and then we haven't even talked about the equipment, right?
In
Out
1:13:16
Because I'm sure there's a minimal, you know, fire engine, 2 fire engines, a rescue.
In
Out
1:13:22
That's another probably $2 million on top of what it's going to cost to build it.
In
Out
1:13:27
But I mean, that would be something that we would have to prioritize and, and not cut.
In
Out
1:13:34
They wouldn't— they can't— if the town wants that station, then it— they can't cut it.
In
Out
1:13:40
Somebody else will be cut.
In
Out
1:13:42
I mean, I'd like to wait on this, this particular vote about putting this on the ballot till we hear what's going on with the plan that Sean was talking about earlier.
In
Out
1:13:52
You know, that you— they're working on a plan.
In
Out
1:13:54
Let's see what it is.
In
Out
1:13:54
And the governor's numbers.
In
Out
1:13:56
And the governor's numbers.
In
Out
1:13:58
I just think this— this— to make a vote tonight on this item is too early without knowing what the plan is or what the budget is.
In
Out
1:14:05
And I've supported bringing it to the residents for— let them decide.
In
Out
1:14:08
But I've always said since day one, the residents got to decide.
In
Out
1:14:11
They're not just buying a building, they got to put manpower and apparatus.
In
Out
1:14:15
So it's a whole package deal.
In
Out
1:14:17
Unfortunately, when we bought it, I said let's make separate warrant articles.
In
Out
1:14:20
For the fire engine ambulance.
In
Out
1:14:21
So if the building gets passes, they realize they got to spend money on this.
In
Out
1:14:25
And I was told, let's not waste our time, let's see if the building— I had an idea on the apparatus, and we were supposed to meet in October and have that discussion, and it never happened.
In
Out
1:14:36
Oh, but we still need people to drive it too, drive the apparatus.
In
Out
1:14:39
So it's a whole package deal.
In
Out
1:14:40
Really?
In
Out
1:14:40
I didn't realize that.
In
Out
1:14:41
I thought they were robots.
In
Out
1:14:42
Well, maybe when we're all passed, that might be the future.
In
Out
1:14:47
Because it, it just doesn't seem like it's just a, a question of whether the town people want it.
In
Out
1:14:54
I want it, but it, it has to, has to come the right way.
In
Out
1:14:58
I mean, if this gets voted in and the town votes for it, it's going to be built in there.
In
Out
1:15:03
They're going to pay for it.
In
Out
1:15:04
We are going to pay for it because we are in this town too.
In
Out
1:15:08
Chief, you're standing there looking at me.
In
Out
1:15:10
Come down if you want to say something.
In
Out
1:15:15
Chief, I think the only thing we need is— because I just don't want to overcommit— so next meeting, or do you need 2 meetings?
In
Out
1:15:22
So, so that would be the beginning of February, the end of February.
In
Out
1:15:27
We just need to finalize some of the slide deck that we had talked about.
In
Out
1:15:31
Yeah, this morning would be aggressive for next meeting, but I can shoot for that.
In
Out
1:15:36
But I can give you an update, you know, by mid-agenda time next week.
In
Out
1:15:40
Well, it's February 4th or the 18th.
In
Out
1:15:42
We could go out to the 18th, which is about a month.
In
Out
1:15:45
I think we got the schools coming in.
In
Out
1:15:47
Yes, the first meeting.
In
Out
1:15:48
So are we okay with the second meeting in February?
In
Out
1:15:50
Just because I don't, I don't want to rush it.
In
Out
1:15:51
I just want to make sure.
In
Out
1:15:52
And then overall, you know, we talked about the, uh, the 5 to 10 year, uh, perspective, uh, so I have yet to even look at that.
In
Out
1:15:57
But okay, so I'll put my mind on that.
In
Out
1:15:59
Um, we'll make sure it's guaranteed for the end of the— the other question I have is the 35-day.
In
Out
1:16:06
So our election is April 6th.
In
Out
1:16:11
So March 6th, that would be the end of February, right?
In
Out
1:16:14
So that would have to be it.
In
Out
1:16:16
No, you, you would set whatever, whatever date you want.
In
Out
1:16:20
No, no, no, no, no.
In
Out
1:16:21
If it goes on the ballot.
In
Out
1:16:23
Oh, I'm sorry.
In
Out
1:16:23
I'm sorry.
In
Out
1:16:24
If it goes on the ballot.
In
Out
1:16:25
Yeah.
In
Out
1:16:25
So that would be the last discussion that would come up.
In
Out
1:16:28
We have to decide that.
In
Out
1:16:29
Take the vote.
In
Out
1:16:30
Yeah, right.
In
Out
1:16:31
They'd have to decide because we got to give the town clerk, uh, like 35 days.
In
Out
1:16:38
35 calendar days.
In
Out
1:16:39
I think it's, I think it's, um, calendar days, not business.
In
Out
1:16:45
It doesn't say one way or the other, just 35 days.
In
Out
1:16:48
Yeah, I'll confirm that.
In
Out
1:16:49
It's the state.
In
Out
1:16:50
I, I do think it's, it's actual days.
In
Out
1:16:53
Calendar days.
In
Out
1:16:53
Yeah.
In
Out
1:16:54
It usually is unless they specify business.
In
Out
1:16:56
We should make it— we'll make it.
In
Out
1:16:58
Yeah, that would just make it.
In
Out
1:17:01
But that would be so everybody knows that that would be the last February 18th.
In
Out
1:17:09
So yeah, and just so everybody— so we can, you know, the walk away is that on average what we're using for a number all in with, you know, health insurance, things of that nature.
In
Out
1:17:20
You know, employee benefits is about $100,000 per firefighter.
In
Out
1:17:24
So I think that's on some of this paperwork too.
In
Out
1:17:33
I have to throw away all the old stuff and start again with new stuff because I got a ton of stuff here for— and do me a favor, we're talking about SEACONC, don't compare us to anybody else Please.
In
Out
1:17:46
We want it because I have things in here that refer to other towns.
In
Out
1:17:51
Let's just talk about Seaconch and the manning and the equipment and the benefits.
In
Out
1:17:55
Okay.
In
Out
1:17:56
Absolutely.
In
Out
1:17:57
And that was part of the overall presentation.
In
Out
1:18:00
You know, I kind of want to get through the weeds, really.
In
Out
1:18:02
Yeah, that's a very refined presentation.
In
Out
1:18:04
Yeah.
In
Out
1:18:04
And that takes time.
In
Out
1:18:05
So yeah.
In
Out
1:18:08
Nope, that's fine.
In
Out
1:18:09
That's so— well, Take a motion to postpone, um, any vote on the South End Fire Station to be put on a town— the town election ballot until February 18th.
In
Out
1:18:22
So moved.
In
Out
1:18:23
February 18th.
In
Out
1:18:24
Um, any other questions?
In
Out
1:18:31
All in favor?
In
Out
1:18:33
Aye.
In
Out
1:18:33
Any opposed?
In
Out
1:18:35
You said aye, Chris?
In
Out
1:18:36
Yes.
In
Out
1:18:37
Okay.
In
Out
1:18:37
Your name on the side.
In
Out
1:18:38
Yeah, no, that's fine.
In
Out
1:18:39
Thank you.
In
Out
1:18:40
Okay, no, thank you, Chief.
In
Out
1:18:42
Thank you very much.
In
Out
1:18:46
Um, all my notes.
In
Out
1:18:51
Okay, consider accepting the open session meeting— no, open session minutes of January 7th, 2026.
In
Out
1:19:00
So moved.
In
Out
1:19:02
Second.
In
Out
1:19:04
Okay, got a motion and a second.
In
Out
1:19:06
Does anybody have any questions, changes, additions?
In
Out
1:19:10
Anything?
In
Out
1:19:11
Anything?
In
Out
1:19:12
Seeing none, all in favor?
In
Out
1:19:14
Aye.
In
Out
1:19:14
Any opposed?
In
Out
1:19:16
Seeing none, unanimous.
In
Out
1:19:17
Thank you.
In
Out
1:19:19
We come to Community Speaks again.
In
Out
1:19:22
Anybody out there?
In
Out
1:19:23
Oh, Mr. Alves, have a seat, my friend.
In
Out
1:19:27
I'm glad, Mr. Community.
In
Out
1:19:30
What can we do for you, Mr. Alves?
In
Out
1:19:32
Thank you, Madam Chairman.
In
Out
1:19:33
John Alves, uh, 25 River Street.
In
Out
1:19:35
Uh, and thank the board for the previous discussion, uh, on the South End Fire Station.
In
Out
1:19:42
Um, as, as I understand it, there is a potential motion to go forward with a, with a ballot question first and then, uh, town meeting.
In
Out
1:19:57
Excuse the language, in my opinion, that's ass-backwards.
In
Out
1:20:01
Um, at town meeting, there's ample opportunity, much opportunity for discussion.
In
Out
1:20:10
You put it on the ballot first, it's limited discussion.
In
Out
1:20:15
If somebody's watching this meeting, fine and dandy, but I don't think that's, that's as as much discussion you'll see at town meeting.
In
Out
1:20:23
So I would much rather see— go to town meeting first, and then if we're going to do that, go to town meeting first and then a ballot question.
In
Out
1:20:33
Okay, I understand that, but you know that what— that is legal.
In
Out
1:20:38
That's why I asked for the legal decision that I read.
In
Out
1:20:41
Completely understood.
In
Out
1:20:42
Okay, it's just Wile E. Coyote, Sneaky Pete, is, is walking in this door by doing it the way that's being suggested.
In
Out
1:20:51
Yeah, but then the ballot is just going to ask— it will tell us whether everybody that votes, if they're interested.
In
Out
1:20:58
And then by going to the town, then they're going to need to have specifics and numbers and dollar amounts.
In
Out
1:21:03
That's not going to be on the ballot.
In
Out
1:21:05
Understood.
In
Out
1:21:06
And neither is there going to be much discussion on the ballot except here's the question, as opposed to town meeting Here's the question, and, and a lot of discussion.
In
Out
1:21:18
What, what my issue is, lack of discussion versus, uh, at ballot versus a town meeting.
In
Out
1:21:26
Okay, thank you.
In
Out
1:21:29
Thank you, Mr. Alves.
In
Out
1:21:31
Anyone else from the community?
In
Out
1:21:33
Come on down, sir.
In
Out
1:21:40
Bob Archambault, 17 Tiringham Road.
In
Out
1:21:43
Uh, a couple points, a little bit of an echo for Mr. Alves there.
In
Out
1:21:47
I, I agree that needs to be discussion, should be open to hear what people have to say about the South End Fire Station.
In
Out
1:21:53
We're adding Whole Foods, Market Basket, a lot of volume, a lot of traffic in the south end of the, of the town.
In
Out
1:22:04
I think it needs to be open.
In
Out
1:22:07
I mean, my, my whole feeling, my whole gut feeling is this whole town politics needs to be more opened up to get more dialogue and transparency.
In
Out
1:22:19
To Mr. Zorra's point, yeah, we're talking about a building.
In
Out
1:22:23
We're also talking about staffing, um, vehicles.
In
Out
1:22:31
Infrastructure to go along with that.
In
Out
1:22:35
It needs to be open.
In
Out
1:22:36
People need to know the whole process.
In
Out
1:22:38
We talked about the Medeiros Farm as an aside.
In
Out
1:22:42
It needs to be opened up so people know the whole story— what's it going to cost, projections, maintenance going forward— not just a piece of it, like a piece of it with a building.
In
Out
1:22:57
The town residents and taxpayers need to know the whole picture.
In
Out
1:23:00
I know you can't nail it down to nickels and dimes.
In
Out
1:23:03
Things rise, they fall.
In
Out
1:23:06
It needs to be transparent where people have a good idea of what they're voting on.
In
Out
1:23:12
So again, with Mr. Alves, I think that's correct.
In
Out
1:23:15
You need to open it up and have more dialogue what's going on, whether it happens to be by law just at that particular meeting needs to be opened up.
In
Out
1:23:25
Another point I want to make with the billboards— we were talking about electronic billboards tonight.
In
Out
1:23:31
I know it was dialogue with 1,000 feet apart, 500 feet apart between a static billboard, traditional and electronic.
In
Out
1:23:40
One of the central themes for the— in tenets of the select board is safety of this town.
In
Out
1:23:46
I didn't hear one question on the safety of these billboards.
In
Out
1:23:51
There's lots of data on are they distracting to people.
In
Out
1:23:55
The whole reason you go from a static billboard to a dynamic billboard that's changing every 15 seconds, every 30 seconds, is to draw the eyeballs to the billboard.
In
Out
1:24:06
That's why they're effective.
In
Out
1:24:08
But if you're on the highway, it's drawing your eyes from what you're supposed to be doing to the billboard.
In
Out
1:24:14
But I didn't hear one single— I heard a lot of questions here, but I select one.
In
Out
1:24:17
I didn't hear one on, are these safe?
In
Out
1:24:20
What is the data that supports these things?
In
Out
1:24:23
The accident data?
In
Out
1:24:25
I didn't hear any of that.
In
Out
1:24:27
And that's very important for the people of this town and people on highways traveling.
In
Out
1:24:30
I'm not saying I'm against billboards and advertising, but I should have heard more of, are these safe?
In
Out
1:24:39
What's the data?
In
Out
1:24:40
Are we protecting people?
In
Out
1:24:43
Not just how far are they apart, not just the zoning, not just the planning.
In
Out
1:24:48
I think it's important, and I think those questions should have been asked to the representatives here tonight, the safety aspects of it.
In
Out
1:24:58
Because I did a search on it while he was speaking, and there's lots of data on it.
In
Out
1:25:02
There are multiple states that you pull up quickly that absolutely ban these because of the accidents.
In
Out
1:25:09
We have cell phones that are distracting.
In
Out
1:25:10
There's all kinds of distractions for everybody today.
In
Out
1:25:14
This just adds another layer of distraction.
In
Out
1:25:18
So I think it needs to be investigated before anybody makes a decision on whether they get electronic billboards in our town.
In
Out
1:25:25
That's all I've got.
In
Out
1:25:26
Thank you.
In
Out
1:25:31
See, there's no other community here.
In
Out
1:25:33
So other business?
In
Out
1:25:34
Um, I don't have any other business.
In
Out
1:25:37
Town Administrator's report?
In
Out
1:25:39
Uh, nothing at this time.
In
Out
1:25:41
Okay.
In
Out
1:25:42
Board of Selectmen liaison reports and comments?
In
Out
1:25:44
Accounts payable warrants signed?
In
Out
1:25:47
Does TV9 liaison have anything?
In
Out
1:25:49
Nothing at this time.
In
Out
1:25:50
Nothing.
In
Out
1:25:51
Okay.
In
Out
1:25:52
Bristol County Advisory Board?
In
Out
1:25:54
Nothing at this time.
In
Out
1:25:55
Okay.
In
Out
1:25:56
Anything new on the Madeira Farm committee?
In
Out
1:25:58
So we have a meeting scheduled, weather pending, whether we get 0 inches of snow or 18 inches of snow.
In
Out
1:26:05
We have a meeting scheduled for Monday to interview the firms that have put in for a proposal.
In
Out
1:26:11
So assuming that there's no closures or weather events, then we'll go forward.
In
Out
1:26:17
If there is, then we're going to have to postpone that.
In
Out
1:26:19
But there's no postponement date yet.
In
Out
1:26:21
That's the 26th.
In
Out
1:26:24
Yes, 26th, Monday.
In
Out
1:26:26
Okay.
In
Out
1:26:29
The Public Library Building Committee?
In
Out
1:26:31
Nothing at this time for that.
In
Out
1:26:33
Well, I'll give you something.
In
Out
1:26:35
You need to set a date for another meeting.
In
Out
1:26:37
Oh yeah.
In
Out
1:26:38
Madeira Swam took up— took on Monday at 6 o'clock this time.
In
Out
1:26:44
Okay, comments?
In
Out
1:26:46
Michael?
In
Out
1:26:47
Nothing.
In
Out
1:26:47
Nothing.
In
Out
1:26:48
Chris, uh, 2 things.
In
Out
1:26:50
Did we ever hear back from Bransky regarding that marijuana license down by Hollister Road?
In
Out
1:26:55
Uh, we may have.
In
Out
1:26:56
Let me— I'll double-check.
In
Out
1:26:58
I'll get that in the morning.
In
Out
1:26:59
And then the other thing you brought up earlier, actually, the flock cameras.
In
Out
1:27:02
Can, um, a few years ago when we sat here and talked to the detective sergeant about how many to get in town, can you just, um, get a follow-up with him and seeing if we have enough, if he thinks we should get more.
In
Out
1:27:17
Um, we allowed him— he wanted a certain number, we allowed him to get more.
In
Out
1:27:20
Yeah, to get all the points.
In
Out
1:27:21
And, um, just an update on that.
In
Out
1:27:22
It's been a few years.
In
Out
1:27:23
If he's satisfied with the locations, with the number that he currently has.
In
Out
1:27:28
Thank you.
In
Out
1:27:32
Is that it, Chris?
In
Out
1:27:33
That's it.
In
Out
1:27:33
Pam?
In
Out
1:27:35
Um, just a reminder, if we can get an agenda item to discuss the old town hall building and what we want to do about moving forward, potential plans.
In
Out
1:27:44
I know there were some ideas tossed out at the town meeting, and I think we as a board should discuss that and kind of come up with some type of plan of moving forward with that building.
In
Out
1:28:03
That's it.
In
Out
1:28:05
Okay, Gary.
In
Out
1:28:07
Yes, did we, uh, do anything more about the, uh, traffic light at Luther's Corners?
In
Out
1:28:14
Remember I suggested that gentleman in town?
In
Out
1:28:17
Uh, yeah, so I haven't reached out to the gentleman, um, but we did reach out to MassDOT, so we're waiting to hear back from them on that.
In
Out
1:28:24
Okay.
In
Out
1:28:24
And then I, I got to get the contact information from the gentleman.
In
Out
1:28:28
Okay.
In
Out
1:28:28
So, and then What is the status of the P&S for 911 Taunton Avenue?
In
Out
1:28:34
So I have the P&S.
In
Out
1:28:35
I just got to review it.
In
Out
1:28:38
We were just— I'm just waiting to hear back from Bob on his closing date.
In
Out
1:28:43
So I want to kind of tie it to his business.
In
Out
1:28:45
So I'm waiting to hear back from him on that so we can incorporate it.
In
Out
1:28:48
But once I review it, I should have it to him by early next week for his review and then back before the board for Official vote on it.
In
Out
1:28:56
Bob or Bill?
In
Out
1:28:57
Bill.
In
Out
1:28:57
I'm sorry.
In
Out
1:28:58
Sorry, I apologize.
In
Out
1:29:01
Bill Murray, that's, you know, What About Bob?
In
Out
1:29:04
So sorry.
In
Out
1:29:09
That it, Mr. Segal?
In
Out
1:29:10
That is all for tonight.
In
Out
1:29:11
Thank you.
In
Out
1:29:12
Okay, the only thing I have for tonight is the north end of town.
In
Out
1:29:17
Lewis Tree has received the contract from National Grid.
In
Out
1:29:21
Perform trimming of the trees away from the power lines.
In
Out
1:29:25
So that's going to be up at the north end of town towards Attleboro and both in Attleboro and Seekonk.
In
Out
1:29:29
So if you see Lewis Tree around, that's what they're doing.
In
Out
1:29:34
They'll be doing some line clearance is what they call it.
In
Out
1:29:40
Okay, everybody good?
In
Out
1:29:42
Okay, I'll take a— hold on, I'll take a motion to adjourn at 9:28.
In
Out
1:29:48
Till our next board meeting, Wednesday, February 4th, same time, same place, 6 PM right here, um, to enter into executive session, not to reconvene in open session for, for anything.
In
Out
1:30:04
For A, to consider accepting executive session minutes of January 7th, 2026.
In
Out
1:30:10
So moved, Gary Sega.
In
Out
1:30:12
Second, Pam Posey.
In
Out
1:30:16
Carrie Singaray.
In
Out
1:30:17
Rosier.
In
Out
1:30:18
Prizoray.
In
Out
1:30:18
Mook Lillian.
In
Out
1:30:19
Michelle Hangzai.
In
Out
1:30:21
Thank you very much.
In
Out
1:30:23
Thank you, Caroline.
In
Out